![]() |
Module 2 Section 1 |
||
|
Module 2: |
Advanced A-scan Biometry | ||
|
Section 1: |
Pseudophakic Scans | ||
Why would you want to, or need
to, perform an A-scan on an eye that already has an IOL? There are several reasons:
There are three question to be answered, or factors to be considered, when performing a pseudophakic A-scan. They have to do with the material the lens is made of, the measuring protocol to be used, and the accuracy of the measurement. What material is the IOL made of?The type of material is important because the velocity of sound is a function of the material that the sound is passing through. A-scans dont actually measure length, they measure how long it takes a sound beam to bounce off an object (anterior lens, posterior lens, and retina) and return to the probe. The instrument is pre-programmed with the velocity of sound factors for the aqueous, the lens material, and the vitreous. Many instruments use an average speed calculation. The instrument performs a calculation that results in a length measurement. The instrument performs different calculations for a eye with a natural lens (phakic), an eye without a lens (aphakic), and an eye with an IOL (pseudophakic). Using the wrong mode will cause an error in the measurement. The material that an IOL is made of will make a difference in a pseudophakic calculation. When performing a pseudophakic scan, you must also take the lens material into consideration to avoid measurement errors. PMMA Many IOLs have been made from PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) plastic. This is the same plastic that the original hard contact lenses were made of. Sound travels faster through PMMA than it does through the natural lens. Most A-scans have a pre-programmed mode for performing PMMA pseudophakic measurements. Silicon Silicon IOLs are foldable. Folding an IOL allows it to be inserted through a smaller incision. A smaller incision heals faster and induces less post-op astigmatism. Sound travels much slower through a silicon lens than it does through the natural lens. Not taking this into account could result in a -3.00 D post-op refractive error. Acrylic Some foldable lenses are now being made of Acrylic plastic. Sound travels faster through acrylic than it does through the natural lens. What measuring protocol should be used?Protocol has to do with how the instrument goes about performing the measurement. Some A-scan instruments use a protocol for phakic scans that individually measures the cornea/anterior chamber, the lens, and the vitreous. This protocol cannot be used for pseudophakic scans because IOLs are so highly reflective that they produce "reverberation" echoes. Instead of two lens spikes, there may be three or four lens spikes. The protocol you use will depend on the instrument you have and type of IOL material you are dealing with. Disclaimer: The author believes that the compensation factors listed in this section have been obtained from reliable sources and have been accurately transcribed. However, the author has not personally tested each factor for reliability. Use these factors at your own risk. It is recommended that you obtain confirmation from other sources before using these factors in your calculations, or use one of the available IOL calculation software packages that deal with these situations. PMMA protocol: Many A-scans have a "Pseudophakic mode" that is pre-programmed for PMMA IOLs. Read your manual and use this mode if it is available. The pseudophakic mode will only be good for PMMA lenses unless your A-scan biometer has settings for other materials. If a pseudophakic mode is not available, you can measure the eye in the aphakic mode and add a standard compensating factor of .4 mm to the resultant axial length. For example: If the aphakic scan gave a result of 24.53 mm, add .4 mm to give a corrected length of 24.93 mm for an eye with a PMMA IOL. Silicon protocol: If your biometer does not have a pseudophakic/silicone mode, or if you are unsure, simply use the aphakic mode and subtract a compensation factor of .8 mm. If the aphakic scan gave a result of 24.53 mm, subtracting .8 mm would give a corrected length of 23.73 mm. Acrylic Protocol: If your biometer does not have a pseudophakic/acrylic mode, or if you are unsure, simply use the aphakic mode and add a compensation factor of .2 mm. If the aphakic scan gave a result of 24.53 mm, adding .2 mm would give a corrected length of 24.73 mm.Protocol for other materials and unusual IOL thickness: The above protocols will not provide an accurate measurement for every silicone or acrylic IOL, depending upon the manufacturer and the lens power. To insure accuracy, try to get the correction factor from the lens manufacturer. References: Jack Holladay, MD The A-Scan Challenge, Rhonda Waldron, MMSc, COMT, CRA, ROUB, RDMS, Eye Scan Consulting, 404-286-9067. Evaluating the scan: Is the measurement accurate?
The figure to the right depicts anterior (A) and posterior (B) lens echoes from an IOL and two reverberation spikes (C, and D).
It is sometimes easier to identify reverberation spikes if the gain is turned down. The manual to your instrument will tell you how to adjust gates or move lights, if necessary. |
|||